博客
关于我
强烈建议你试试无所不能的chatGPT,快点击我
How those spring enable annotations work--转
阅读量:6826 次
发布时间:2019-06-26

本文共 10835 字,大约阅读时间需要 36 分钟。

原文地址:http://blog.fawnanddoug.com/2012/08/how-those-spring-enable-annotations-work.html

Spring's Java Config is a great way to configure your application without writing a lot of configuration code.  One reason is those awesome @Enable* annotations that let you magically set up things like Transactions (@EnableTransactionManagement), Spring MVC (@EnableWebMvc) or timed jobs (@EnableScheduling) with a simple class level annotation on your configuration class. These simple statements provide a lot of functionality but their machinations are fairly obscure.  On the one hand, it's great to get so much functionality for so little work, but on the other hand, if you don't understand how something works it makes debugging and problem solving much harder.  I couldn't find any posts or documents that covered how those annotations work so I figured I would write up one based on the research I did while debugging.  I don't work for Spring and I didn't write any of this code so please post any corrections or improvements in the comments and I'll update the post.

Design Goals

From what I can tell, the design goal of those @Enable* annotations is to allow the user set up complex functionality with a minimal amount of code.  In addition, it seems clear that users must be able to use either a  simple default or be allowed to manually configure that code.  Finally, the complexities of the code are intended to be hidden from the user.  In short, let the user set up a lot of beans and optionally configure them without having to know the details of those beans (or really what's being set up).  I think there are a lot of pros (and some cons) to this approach but I'll discuss that at the end.

Case #1: @EnableScheduling (importing an @Configuration class)

The first thing to note is that the @Enable* annotations are not magic.  Nothing in the Bean Factory knows anything about them specifically and there are no dependencies in the Bean Factory classes between the core functionality and specific annotations (like @EnableWebMvc) or the jars they're stored in (like spring-web).  Let's take a look at @EnableScheduling and see how it works.  You might have a MainConfig class that looks like this:

1
2
3
4
5
@Configuration
@EnableScheduling
public
class
MainConfig {
// some beans go in here
}

There's nothing special in the above. Just a standard Java Config that's annotated with @EnableScheduling. @EnableScheduling lets you execute certain methods at a set frequency. For example, you can run BankService.sendMoneyToDoug() every 20 minutes.   The @EnableScheduling annotation itself looks like this: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
@Target
(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention
(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Import
(SchedulingConfiguration.
class
)
@Documented
public
@interface
EnableScheduling {
 
}

If we look at the annotation above, we can see that it is just a standard Class level annotation (@Target/@Retention) that should be included in JavaDocs (@Documented), but it has one Spring-specific annotation: @Import.  @Import is the key that ties everything together.  In this case, since our MainConfig is annotated as @EnableScheduling, when the Bean Factory is parsing the file (technically the ConfigurationClassPostProcessor is parsing it) it will also find the @Import(SchedulingConfiguration.class) annotation and it will import the class defined in the value.  In this case SchedulingConfiguration.  What does it mean to import?  Well, in this case it's just treated as another Spring bean.  SchedulingConfiguration is actually annotated as @Configuration, so the Bean Factory will see it as another configuration class and all of the beans defined in that class will get pulled into your Application Context just as if you had defined another @Configuration class yourself.  If we inspect SchedulingConfiguration we can see that it only defines one bean (a Post Processor) which does the scheduling we described above.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
@Configuration
public
class
SchedulingConfiguration {
 
 
@Bean
(name=AnnotationConfigUtils.SCHEDULED_ANNOTATION_PROCESSOR_BEAN_NAME)
 
@Role
(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
 
public
ScheduledAnnotationBeanPostProcessor scheduledAnnotationProcessor() {
  
return
new
ScheduledAnnotationBeanPostProcessor();
 
}
 
}

OK, but what if I want to configure the beans defined in SchedulingConfiguration?  Well, at this point we're just dealing with regular beans.  So the same mechanisms that you would use for any other beans apply here.  In this case, the ScheduledAnnotationBeanPostProcessor uses a standard Spring Application Event to find out when the Application Context is refreshed.  When this happens it checks to see if any beans implement SchedulingConfigurer and if so, uses those beans to configure itself.  This is not at all intuitive (or easy to find with an IDE) but it is completely separated from the Bean Factory and is a fairly common pattern for a bean to be used to configure another bean.  And now that we can connect all of the dots it is (somewhat) easy to find (or you could google the documentation or read the JavaDocs).

Case #2: @EnableTransactionManagement (importing an ImportSelector)

In the previous case we discussed how an annotation like @EnableScheduling can use @Import to pull in another @Configuration Class and make all of its beans available (and configurable) to your application. But what happens if you want to load a different set of beans based on some configuration?  @EnableTransactionManaged is a good example of this.  You might have a MainConfig class that looks like this:
 
1
2
3
4
5
@Configuration
@EnableTransactionManagement
(mode=AdviceMode.ASPECTJ)
public
class
MainConfig {
// some beans
}
 
Once again, there's  nothing special in the above. Just a standard Java Config that's annotated with @EnableTransactionManagement. The only thing that's a little different from the previous example is that the user specified a parameter to the annotation (mode=AdviceMode.ASPECTJ).  The @EnableTransactionManagement annotation itself looks like this:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
@Target
(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention
(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Import
(TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.
class
)
public
@interface
EnableTransactionManagement {
 
boolean
proxyTargetClass()
default
false
;
 
AdviceMode mode()
default
AdviceMode.PROXY;
 
int
order()
default
Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
As before, a fairly standard annotation, although this time it has some parameters.  However, I mentioned previously that the @Import annotation was the key that ties everything together and that is true once again.  The distinction though, is that this time we are importing TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector.class which is not a class that is annotated with @Configuration.  TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector is a class that implements ImportSelector.  The purpose of ImportSelector is to allow your code to choose which configuration classes to load at runtime.  It has one method that takes some metadata about an annotation and returns an array of class names.  In this case, the TransactionManagementConfigurationSelector looks at the mode and returns some classes based on the mode:

 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
protected
String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) {
 
switch
(adviceMode) {
  
case
PROXY:
   
return
new
String[] { AutoProxyRegistrar.
class
.getName(), ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration.
class
.getName() };
  
case
ASPECTJ:
   
return
new
String[] { TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME };
  
default
:
   
return
null
;
 
}
}

Most of these classes are @Configuration classes (e.g. ProxyTransactionManagementConfiguration) so we know that they'll work like before, but some of them are not (let's ignore those for now).  For the @Configuration classes they get loaded and configured in the exact same way that we previously saw.  So in short, we can use @Import with an @Configuration class to load a standard set of beans or we can use @Import with an ImportSelector to load a set of beans that are decided at run time.  Sweet! But what about those classes we ignored?

Case #3: @EnableAspectJAutoProxy (importing at the Bean Definition Level)

@Import supports one last case which is when you want to deal with a Bean Registry (Factory) directly. If you need to manipulate the Bean Factory or work with beans at the Bean Definition level then this case is for you and it's very similar to the ones above.  Your MainConfig might look like:

1
2
3
4
5
@Configuration
@EnableAspectJAutoProxy
public
class
MainConfig {
// some beans
}

Once again, there's nothing special in the above. Just a standard Java Config that's annotated with @EnableAspectJAutoProxy.  Here's the source for @EnableAspectJAutoProxy:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
@Target
(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention
(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Import
(AspectJAutoProxyRegistrar.
class
)
public
@interface
EnableAspectJAutoProxy {
 
boolean
proxyTargetClass()
default
false
;
 
}

As before, the @Import is the key, but this time it's pointing to AspectJAutoProxyRegistrar which is neither an @Configuration class nor implements ImportSelector.  The trick this time is that it implements ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrar.  This interface gives access to the Bean Registry and Annotation Metadata so that we can manipulate the registry at runtime based off of the parameters in the annotation.  If you look at the previous case you can see that the classes we ignored were also ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrars.  These classes directly manipulate the Bean  Factory for those times when @Configuration classes aren't enough. 
So now we've covered all of the different ways the @Enable* annotations use @Import to pull various beans into your Application Context.  They either pull in a set of @Configuration classes directly and all of the beans from those classes get imported into your Application Context.  Or they pull in an ImportSelector which chooses a set of @Configuration classes at runtime and imports those beans into your Application Context.  Or finally, they pull in an ImportBeanDefinitionRegistrars which can directly work with the Bean Factory at the Bean Definition level.

Conclusion

In general I think this approach to importing beans into an Application Context is great because it makes set up very easy for the developer.  Unfortunately it obscures how to find the available options and how to configure them.  In addition, it doesn't directly take advantage of the IDE so it's hard to tell which beans are being created (and why).  However, now that we know about the @Import annotation we can use our IDE to dig a little into each Annotation and its related configuration classes and understand which beans are being created, how they're being added to your Application Context and how to configure them.  I hope this helps! Please leave comments to let me know what you think and what I've missed / messed up.

转载地址:http://dwrzl.baihongyu.com/

你可能感兴趣的文章
软件工程——第一周作业
查看>>
ubuntu14.04安装vmware workstation
查看>>
ArcGIS API for Silverlight部署本地地图服务
查看>>
小知识点
查看>>
python mongodb MapReduce
查看>>
python-数据类型
查看>>
Google MapReduce/GFS/BigTable三大技术的论文中译版
查看>>
Linux atop监控工具部署
查看>>
struts2请求过程源码分析
查看>>
效率比较--集合
查看>>
jmeter IF控制器学习--使用实例
查看>>
memory prefix retro,re out 2
查看>>
WebDriver API 实例详解(四)
查看>>
dom01
查看>>
Android实例-如何使用系统剪切板(XE8+小米2)
查看>>
BAT-显示桌面图标
查看>>
PDO vs. MySQLi 选择哪一个?(PDO vs. MySQLi: Which Should You Use?)-转载
查看>>
信息安全系统设计基础第七周总结
查看>>
创建线程的三种方式
查看>>
Android项目依赖于第三方库(非jar包文件)
查看>>